Shades of Scrum: Empirical Management Meetings

November 26, 2013 at 12:58 pm 2 comments


Ken Schwaber defines empirical process control (aka empirical management) as one of the pillars of Scrum. Empirical management means to recognize what is (reality) and to base decisions on facts. Empirical managements needs:

  • Transparency (we need to be able to see the facts and should not rely on things that aren’t provable)
  • Inspection (we have to evaluate and interpret the transparent facts)
  • Adaptation (we modify the plan according to the inspection)

The Sprint Review, the Sprint Retrospective and the Daily Scrum are empirical management meetings in Scrum. In the Sprint Retrospective for example we first create transparency about the way we work (the Gather Data phase) then we inspect what we have found (the Generate Insights phase) and then we adapt the way we work (the Decide What To Do phase).

Applying these three steps of empirical management to the Daily Scrum and Sprint Review meetings often is an interesting exercise since a lot of “Scrum” teams miss adaptation and sometimes even inspection. And it gets worse when teams use additional meetings like a Scrum of Scrums where there are no “by-the-book-checklists” around on how to do them. So they just pollute the meeting we status reports and don’t inspect and adapt.

When looking at a meeting I suggest discussing if it is an empirical management meeting. If it is I would design the meeting backwards with the end in mind. Who should adapt what? When we know that we can easily find out how to inspect and finally what transparency we need.

So here is my “checklist” for the design of an empirical management meeting:

  1. Define what you want to adapt in what way. (Adaptation)
  2. Find out what you need to learn in order to be able to adapt. (Inspection)
  3. Find out what you need transparency about to do the inspection. (Transparency)

If you want to adapt the release plan as the result of the Sprint Review we need to inspect velocity during the Sprint Review and would therefore check what features where implemented and count story points. If we want to adapt the Product Backlog with new ideas that would improve the product we would probably have customers at the Sprint Review and gather feedback and ideas from them.

Entry filed under: it-agile-blog-planet. Tags: .

Team Based Rewards Blog-Statistik 2013

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Shades of Scrum | Stefan Roock  |  November 26, 2013 at 1:01 pm

    […] Empirical Management Meetings: The article highlights that fact that most Scrum meetings are empirical management meetings and therefore there should be transparency, inspection and adaptation in the meetings. The article gives guidelines on how to optimize these meetings for your context. […]

  • 2. Buchtipp: “Software in 30 Tagen” | Stefan Roock  |  January 5, 2014 at 7:31 pm

    […] Prozesskontrolle findet sich z.B. hier. Was das für die Scrum-Meetings bedeutet, habe ich in einem Blog-Post […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed



Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 188 other followers

%d bloggers like this: